Vandaag, 20 maart, is het precies drie jaar geleden dat de VS Irak binnenvielen, en dit werd herdacht met wereldwijde demonstraties tegen deze oorlog. De kritiek is bekend: de VS vielen onder valse voorwendselen binnen, gedroegen zich vervolgens als de nieuwe heersers zonder enig respect voor de bevolking, en eigenlijk ging het ze alleen om de olie. De gevangenisschandalen rond Abu Graib en Quantanamo Bay laten zien dat de VS geen haar beter zijn. De tegenargumenten zijn ook duidelijk: Saddam Hoessein was een wrede dictator en het is goed dat de VS hem uit de weg hebben geruimd, Irak was een bron van instabiliteit in de regio, steunde terrorisme en er waren serieuze aanwijzingen dat hij massavernietigingswapens bezat. Abu Graib is niet goed, maar daar zijn de betreffende mensen inmiddels voor gestraft. Inmiddels zijn er vrije verkiezingen geweest (waarin niet de favoriet van de VS is gekozen), en is een grondwet vastgesteld. Men is op de goede weg, al is de weg moeilijk. Lees verder...
Ratna Pelle on 03.22.06 @ 02:31 AM CST [link]
Left-wing people want to put principles and moral values above opportunity and power-games. I speak out of my own experience and don't aim to bash the left here. When I was younger and more naive than I am now (I am still no old lady and naive sometimes) I made lists of all kinds of companies that were involved in dirty politics, and drove my parents crazy by insisting to not buy anything from them. The lists became longer and longer and I found out that it became quite impossible to go shopping or simply buy food, and convenience won out over my noble principles. But there was more. I found out that boycotts only make sense if you do them in an organized way and a large number of people join in, so the company really suffers from it. Also it is important to make clear to the company why you boycott them and put forward demands about what they have to change. As one can't do that for all firms that are involved in dirty things, we targeted some 'symbols' of the policy and morality we despised so much, like MacDonald's and Shell. Insofar that we were successful, people went to Burger King or Kentucky Fried Chicken instead, and fuelled at Texaco instead. One can seriously question if that is a big achievement for our goals, namely a better and more just world and less environmental pollution. Lees verder...
Ratna Pelle on 03.11.06 @ 06:25 PM CST [link]
After reading Electronic Intifada, Counterpunch and Indymedia, or even the Guardian, the BBC or Le Monde it becomes quite clear: There is only one problem in the Middle East, and one aggressive country. All-powerful and land hungry, it pursues its racist policies and swallows up more and more Arab land. This view is even more popular in the Arab world, where it is often accompanied by classic anti-Semitism like the blood libel, the notion that the Jews are all-powerful and strive for world domination, the Holocaust is a lie of the Zionists to get world sympathy for their country, and so on. Read more about that at "Arab Antisemitism Books", where you can find an anthology of the latest anti-Semitic books published in Syria. Also in Egypt, a country that made peace with Israel and got back all of the Sinai in return, these ideas are quite popular and popularized in soaps on TV and cartoons in newspapers. The charter of Hamas says exactly the things mentioned above, including a referral to a Hadith that calls on the muslims to kill all the Jews in the end of days. All Arab countries supported the 'Zionism is racism' resolution, endorsed by the UN in 1975, and opposed its repeal in 1991. Lees verder...
Ratna Pelle on 03.11.06 @ 03:47 AM CST [link]