"... the response of
the Jewish world has been misleading. Some of the Jewish
institutions have issued statements like the following that
came from the San Francisco Jewish Federation and the local
chapter of the Anti-Defamation League (ADL): "We
unequivocally condemn criminal acts perpetrated against
Rabbi Lerner's home. Political disagreements must be
resolved in a civil manner, and not by resorting to
violence. Our communities are especially disturbed that this
crime targeted Rabbi Lerner at his home, thereby conveying
to him the message that he may not be safe there. We are
encouraged by the responsiveness of the Berkeley Police
Department to this incident, and we urge its officers to
investigate this crime as thoroughly as possible. The entire
community must send a message to the perpetrators that we
reject violence and criminality as a means to express our
political opinions."
This is at once a step in the right direction and yet an
evasion of the central issue. We didn't expect that they
would endorse violence. What we must demand is that these
Jewish organizations publicly and repeatedly make attempts
to stop the incitement to violence that happens on a daily
basis inside the Jewish community and towards tens of
thousands of Jews and non-Jews who speak out about Israeli
treatment of Palestinians or who organize to try to change
Israeli policies."
Tikkun condemns the entire
"Jewish World." As usual, the
Jews are at fault for everything. If that is not an
anti-Semitic thesis, what is? The "Jewish world" of Tikkun is as
an invention as pernicious as the "international finance Jewry"
invented by certain others.
Evidently, the "central issue"
for Tikkun is that everyone should shut up and toe the Tikkun
line. Anyone who disagrees with you is guilty of inciting to
violence and vandalizing Rabbi Lerner's home in your view, and
that includes the entire "Jewish world." In fact, there has been
very little incitement to violence, certainly not by large
Jewish organizations in the USA or sources in Israel, and those
who are doing it are no fans of Alan Dershowitz (whom they
consider a liberal wimp) or of the large Jewish organizations.
You wrote:
"As right-wing
Zionists proved by assassinating peace-oriented Israeli
Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin who sought to end the
Occupation, there is no way to protect anyone in this
world from fanatics bent on hurting others.
"
That is true enough as far as
it goes. But just as blaming "leftists" for Palestinian
terror can incite violence against you, blaming "the Jewish
world" for this act of vandalism can and is inciting
violence against
Jews
We are not all followers of
Rabbi Kahaneh, and we are not all guilty of the assassination of
Yitzhak Rabin as you imply. How dare you?
The gold standard for reactions
to violence in the Middle East was probably set by people like
Yitzhak Frankenthal, who founded the Parents' Circle after his
son was murdered by Hamas, by the Pearl family who founded the
Pearl Foundation after their son was beheaded by Jihadists, by
Yehoshua Zamir who was a member of Parents' Circle and a founder
of MidEastWeb, and by my friend Dr. Izzeldin Abuelaish, who has
written a book calling for peace after his three daughters were
killed by the IDF in the Gaza war. But you have unfortunately
not chosen to emulate any of them. You do not extend the hand of
peace to enemies, or even to friends. Not only do you return bad
for bad, you return bad for good. And think of it, nobody beat
you up or bombed you. It was a nasty and silly act of vandalism.
What is your loss compared to that of Yitzhak Frankenthal, Judea
Pearl or Izzeldin Abuelaish? This is the reaction of people with
small hearts and closed minds, cynical people who are trying to
profit from conflict and strife behind a veneer of
self-righteousness and holier than thou "spiritual
progressivism."
My gut reaction is that what
you wrote is revolting. It lacks "derekh eretz." It is
ungracious, callous and cynical to reject a sincere expression
of regret and solidarity. While others are able to rise above
political bickering and uphold decency, Tikkun was unable to do
so.
What sort of "spiritual
progressive" tries to build a message of hate and to shut people
up using the alibi of a single act of vandalism, perpetrator
unknown ??
The Middle East conflict is
already replete with martyrs and massacres that "need" avenging.
Evil people use this long history in order to generate more
massacres: The expulsion of the Jews from Jerusalem, the riots
of 1929, Deir Yassin, the Nakba, Koby Mandel, the Hatuel
family... You are trying to add to the list it seems.
We do not really know why such
attacks occur, or what triggered this attack. It has more to do
with the personality of the attacker than with the issues or
what anyone says. Nobody has been caught or charged. Wise people
refrain from casting blame in those cases. Almost everyone
concluded that the bombing of the Federal Office building in
Oklahoma City was the work of Islamist extremists, but it was
done in fact by Timothy McVeigh.
Until the culprit is caught you certainly have no idea of their
motives or what influenced them. Even then, it is not logical to
assume that they were motivated by reading speeches or writings
of Alan Dershowitz or Abe Foxman. A great many people read those
materials, but most of them don't trash anyone's house.
There are real physical attacks
against Zionists and Jews living abroad: Jewish students getting
beaten up in North America, Jews murdered in Europe. Suppose
that pro-Israel groups blamed every attack on Zionists on the
rhetoric of TIkkun and "spiritual progressives?" If your logic
is correct, then we Israelis can also blame every suicide
bombing in the last Intifada on the incitement and demonization
that appeared in the pages of Tikkun, which legitimized the fake
Palestinian Arab narrative, and on the demonization of Israelis
and Zionists in your article about the vandalism.
It is ugly and cheap to try to
exploit an act of vandalism, probably done by a disturbed person
with a history of violence, in order to smear all those who have
a political difference of opinion with you. You do not like
epithets such as "self-hating Jew" and "anti-Semite." But you do
not consider the effect of the epithets that Tikkun, Goldstone,
and others that Tikkun endorses, use against Israelis, Zionists
and the IDF. If we are all war criminal monsters, then of course
it is OK to beat us up and kill us, isn't it?
"Do not do to your friend what
is hateful to you."
You wrote:
If
everyone who challenges Israeli policy is anti-Semitic
(which would include a majority of American Jews but not a
majority of those one encounters in most synagogues or
official Jewish institutions) then it may (mistakenly)
appear to people that it's no big thing to be anti-Semitic.
You exploited
the opportunity for a bit of cheap political spin and
fabrication. The majority of American Jews, according to every
poll, and the majority of Americans, support Israeli policy on
Jerusalem and other key issues, in opposition to your stands.
You wrote:
When,
for example, Jews are told that they have the blood of
innocents on their hands because of the activities of some
members of the IDF (Israeli army) in Israel, thereby blaming
all Jews for the activities of some, this is racism straight
out, just as it was when Blacks were blamed for the criminal
activities of some Blacks. The Jewish people never voted in
a referendum to give the State of Israel or its army the
right to speak or represent all Jews around the world,
Your response to anti-Semitic allegations is not deny them, but
to dissociate yourselves. You do not claim that there are bad
individuals, but rather that the entire state of
Israel is at fault. You are
like the German Jews who imagined that the Nazis were not aiming
at them, but only at the poor and uneducated "ost-Juden."
If the state of
Israel does not speak for the Jewish people, then who does? A new age rabbi in
California and his yuppy adherents? If ever the
Jews
are in distress, anywhere, the same Jews that spit on Israel and
disown it, will certainly expect that the state of Israel and
the Zionist movement will do its best to protect them. It has
happened before, and it will happen again. When you spit on
Israel and on our army, our sons and daughters, you are spitting
on yourself.
You wrote:
And you can demand of
the Jewish world that they stop encouraging incitement by
allowing people or groups to be labeled as anti-Semitic or
"self-hating Jews..."
Who is in this mysterious
"Jewish world" and how do we demand things of it? Isn't Rabbi
Lerner and isn't Tikkun part of the "Jewish world?" or do you
consider yourselves to be either not Jewish or not of this
world? On the one hand, you claim that the state of Israel does
not represent the
Jews and that
Jews should not be blamed for what the "evil" state of
Israel and the "evil" Zionists do. On the other hand, you claim
that there is a "Jewish world" controlled apparently by the
"International Zionist conspiracy" or the "International Finance
Jewry" or the Elders of Zion, and this "Jewish world" is
inciting against Tikkun and poor Rabbi Lerner, who has to
represent the "Jewish people" all on his own.
Should we picket the Elders of
Zion who control the "Jewish world?" Should we write to them?
What is their address? How can it NOT be anti-Semitic to blame
the entire "Jewish world" for one act of vandalism?? How can it
NOT be anti-Semitic to tell your readers that there is a "Jewish
world" that acts in concert and that can be addressed in some
way?
You wrote:
So here is what you can
do: write and call people in the media to urge them to do a
news story (no national American or European media have
picked up on this yet), to interview Rabbi Lerner, and to
write editorials condemning incitement.
So that is what I am doing,
obedient to your call. I am writing this letter, that will be
published as an editorial, to condemn Tikkun's incitement
against the "Jewish world," and against anyone who disagrees
with Tikkun, and against Tikkun's attempt to use this petty
incident to get cheap publicity for Rabbi Lerner and to stifle
legitimate debate and differences of opinion by labeling it
"incitement." I may also mail copies to the
list of editors you offer.
And here is what you can do:
Look within you and repent, before you ask others to do so. Call
a meeting of reconciliation to be attended by representatives of
the entire Jewish community - including the hated Zionists.
Offer your apologies for the insults and incitement you have
heaped on others, including those you have written in the
article about the vandalism of Lerner's home, and look for a way
to work for peace without demonizing your brothers and sisters.
Sincerely,
Ami Isseroff
5 Comments:
I, personally, would not do it unless situation is critical but I would not cry crocodile tears if somebody does. It reminds me of Nazi provocation in Reichtag
By
Igor,
At
May 7, 2010 4:34:00 PM GMT+00:00
By
Hebro,
At
May 8, 2010 7:53:00 AM GMT+00:00
Israel is the least violent country in the world and Jews have never occupied another peoples' land in all their 4000 year history.
Moses was the first Zionist.
By
Joseph,
At
May 8, 2010 9:16:00 AM GMT+00:00
By
emily,
At
May 8, 2010 10:55:00 AM GMT+00:00
Want to see how much you really know about Israel's capitol? Log in to the Jerusalem Center's short quiz about Jerusalem and find out: http://www.jcpa.org/quiz/jerusalemquiz.html
By
Debbie,
At
May 9, 2010 5:16:00 PM GMT+00:00
Post a Comment