ZioNation - Progressive Zionism and Israel Web Log

ZioNation home Archives Site map Policy Definitions FAQ timeline history documents Links Photos Contact

Articles and Reference

History of Zionism and Israel
Zionism
Middle East Encyclopedia
History of Anti-Semitism
History of Anti-Zionism
Encylopedic Dictionary of Zionism and Israel
Zionism and its Impact
Zionism - Issues & answers
Maps of Israel
Six Day War
War of Independence
Bible
Bible  Quotes
1948 Israel War of Independence Timeline Christian Zionism
Christian Zionism History
Gaza & the Qassam Victims of Sderot
Zionist Quotes
Learn Hebrew
Jew
Anti-Semitism
Pogrom
Israel
Zionists
Israel Boycott?
Boycott Israel?
Palestinian Campaign for the Academic and Cultural Boycott of Israel
Jew Hate
International Zionism
Commentary in Russian
Middle East
The Grand Mufti Hajj Amin Al Husseini
Albert Einstein
Palestine: Ethnic Cleansing
History Arab-Israeli Conflict
Boycott Israel?
Amnesty International Report on Gaza War


FREE EMAIL SUBSCRIPTION
Subscribe to
ZNN
email newsletter for this site and others

Powered by groups.yahoo.com

The significance of the Palestinian unity agreement signed in Mecca is no longer in doubt. In case anyone did not understand, Palestinian sources have made it abundantly clear. There are three important points. The first is that Abbas and the Fatah have capitulated to the Hamas. The second is that Palestinians aspire to get a state in 1967 borders and right of return, without recognizing Israel's right to exist. The third is that the new government will rely on Arab backing to make the Quartet boycott irrelevant.


In the struggle with Hamas, Abbas has thrown in the towel. As Palestinian commentator Ray Hanania observed:

Today, with no sign of a possible peace accord on the horizon, thanks to Hamas intransigence on compromise, Hamas has forced the secular Palestinian leadership to surrender to its will...

In essence, Hamas has positioned itself to become the voice of the Palestinians. But rather than be a voice of reason, compromise and even tolerance of other views, Hamas will continue to pursue its "all or nothing" agenda...

The real war was a terrible burden, but it required the secular Palestinians to defeat the Hamas fanatics. Despite the pain of an internal Palestinian civil war, the question of whether the future would be in the hands of Hamas or Fatah was too important to sign away in some pathetic deal in which Abbas has basically surrendered his leadership.

According to Haaretz:

"Abbas told senior State Department official David Welch that the Mecca agreement was the only possible agreement and the world must deal with it, Abba aide Nabil Abu Rdeneh said, after the meeting in Ramallah with Welch. "

Saudi and Arab backing have now given the Palestinian authority the authority of a superpower, so that it can tell the USA where to get off. One can almost hear Yasser Arafat saying, "And anyone who doesn't like it can drink the waters of the Dead Sea."

Khaled Meshaal made the intent of the agreement clear when he wrote in the Guardian, under the title, Our unity can now pave the way for peace and justice:

Now that Hamas and Fatah have agreed to form a national unity government, the international community has no excuse to maintain the siege against our people...The Palestinian national accord achieved in Mecca envisages the establishment of a truly sovereign and independent Palestinian state on the territories occupied by Israel in June 1967 - with Jerusalem as its capital, the dismantling of the settlements in the West Bank, the release of all Palestinian prisoners and the acknowledgement of the right of the refugees to return to their homes.

Hamas has reiterated, on the other hand, that they would never recognize the right of Israel to exist, even after this program is in place. So Meshal's program is "land and right of return" for nothing.

The Palestinians are counting on European donors to break the boycott, which will in any case be circumvented by Arab donations. That is what his quote from atah spokesman Mahir Moqdad in Maannews seems to mean:

"this government should have the right to have alternatives and substitutes instead of the siege lifting."

To be clear, it means that Fatah is saying that the Palestinians should have alternatives to agreeing to recognize the right of Israel to exist and to seek peace.

Therefore, it is alarming that the US and Israel behave almost as if nothing happened. Mahmoud Abbas is still considered a "peace partner" and Condoleezza Rice says:

"I think that we can continue to work with Abu Mazen, continue to discuss with Abu Mazen, continue to explore with Abu Mazen..."

How can the US and Israel "continue to work" with a peace partner who has signed an agreement not to seek peace? The Palestinian unity deal presents a new reality to the Americans and to Israel. If they are not proactive in meeting it, the Palestinians and their Arab world allies will make the road map, the Quartet and the US irrelevant. They will establish a de facto Palestinian state that will enjoy the support of the Arab world, Africa, China Russia and perhaps the EU. They will press on relentlessly with their programs of "resistance" and "land and right of return" for nothing.

Unfortunately, it seems that at the summit meeting held today, neither Israel nor the US presented the Palestinians with anything new. Stonewalling and appeals to the roadmap are not enough, because the roadmap will soon be irrelevant. For all intents and purposes, when he signed the Mecca agreement, Abbas declared the end of the roadmap, and the end of the peace process. He as much as said "I am not a peace partner." Getting Abbas out of the clutches of the Hamas, if it is at all possible, requires both a very big stick and a very big carrot. The "political horizon" in either case must be very clear. In the absence of such a program, it would have been better to have cancelled this trilateral summit, than to make an exhibition of the futility of Israeli and American policy.

Ami Isseroff


Original content is Copyright by the author 2007. Posted at ZioNation-Zionism and Israel Web Log, http://www.zionism-israel.com/log/archives/00000354.html where your intelligent and constructive comments are welcome. Disributed by ZNN list. Subscribe by sending a message to ZNN-subscribe@yahoogroups.com. Please forward by e-mail with this notice, cite this article and link to it. Other uses by permission only.

Click to Reddit! Facebook Share

add to del.icio.us

Add to digg - digg it

Replies: 1 Comment

War and hating have always been the easy option. It seems that the Palestinian leadership have baulked at the challenges the "peace" process posed them. I am not surprised really, in hindsight the signs have probably always been there.

As for the Palestinian position I am reminded of an old IRA song, "we're on the one road, it maybe the wrong road, but we're together now so who cares".

Rod Davies, Thursday, February 22nd


Constructive comments, including corrections, are welcome. Do not use this space for spam, publishing articles, self promotion, racism, anti-Zionist propaganda or character defamation. Inappropriate comments will be deleted. See our Comment policy for details. By posting here, you agree to the Comment policy.

Home
Archives

Please take our reader survey!

Links
Our Sites

Zionism
Zionism News Net
Zionism-Israel Pages
Brave Zionism
IsraŽl-Palestina.Info (Dutch & English)
Our Blogs
Israel News
IMO Blog - IsraŽl & Midden-Oosten (NL)
Israel Like this, as if
Zionism News Net
Israel & Palestijnen Nieuws Blog
IsraŽl in de Media


Blog Roll:
Adam Holland
Blue Truth
CIF Watch
Contentious Centrist
Dutchblog Israel (NL/EN)
Harry's Place
Ignoble Experiment
Irene Lancaster's Diary
Israeli-Palestinian Conflict
Israpundit
Jeff Weintraub Commentaries and controversies
Jewish Issues Watchdog Meretz USA Weblog
Meryl Yourish
Middle East Analysis
MidEastWeb Middle East Web Log
Modernity Blog
normblog
Pro Israel Bay Bloggers
Point of no return
Simply Jews
Solomonia
Something Something
Tempting Topical Topics
The Augean Stables
Unplugged Mike
Oy Bay! San Francisco Bay Area Jews
Vital Perspective
Israel Mon Amour
Liberty & Justice
On the Contrary
Magdeburger Chossid
Tulip - Israeli-Palestinian Trade Union Assoc.
Southern Wolf
Sharona's Week
Sanda & Israel
Fresno Zionism
Anti-Racist Blog
UN-Biased
ZOTW's Zionism and Israel News
Zionism On The Web News
ZOTW's Blogs
Christian Attitudes
Dr Ginosar Recalls
Questions: Zionism anti-Zionism Israel & Palestine
Liberal for Israel

A Jew with a view
BlueTruth
Realistic Dove
Christians Standing With Israel - Blog
Liberticracia
SEO for Everyone
Vision to Reality: The Reut Blog
Calev's Blog
Candidly speaking from Jerusalem
Dvar Dea
Ray Cook
Shimshon 9

Mark Halawa


This link space is 4 your blog - contact us!

Other Web sites and pages:

PeaceWatch Middle East Commentary Christians Standing With Israel
Zionism On the Web
Guide to Middle East, Zionism
Z-Word
Z-Word blog
Labor Zionism
Le Grand Mufti Husseini
The Grand Mufti Hajj Amin El Husseini
ZNN - Zionism News Network Middle East
Euston Manifesto
Jewish Blogging
Peace With Realism
Israel Facts (NL)
Space Shuttle Blog
SEO
Mysterology
Love Poems
At Zionism On the Web
Articles on Zionism
Anti-Zionism Information Center
Academic boycott of Israel Resource Center
The anti-Israel Hackers
Antisemitism Information Center
Zionism Israel and Apartheid
Middle East, Peace and War
The Palestine state
ZOTW Expert Search
ZOTW Forum



Judaica

Judaica: Jewish Gifts:
Shofar
Mezuzah



RSS V 1.0


RSS V 2.0


Home » Archives » February 2007 » Has the peace process ended, and didn't Israel and USA notice?

[Previous entry: "Temple Mount Tremors"] [Next entry: "A diplomat reacts to Israel's scandals"]

Help us improve - Please click here to take our reader survey

All entries copyright by the authors and or Zionism-Israel Information Center. Please forward materials by e-mail with URLS. Other uses by permission only.

security