ZioNation - Progressive Zionism and Israel Web Log

ZioNation home Archives Site map Policy Definitions FAQ timeline history documents Links Photos Contact

Articles and Reference

History of Zionism and Israel
Middle East Encyclopedia
History of Anti-Semitism
History of Anti-Zionism
Encylopedic Dictionary of Zionism and Israel
Zionism and its Impact
Zionism - Issues & answers
Maps of Israel
Six Day War
War of Independence
Bible  Quotes
1948 Israel War of Independence Timeline Christian Zionism
Christian Zionism History
Gaza & the Qassam Victims of Sderot
Zionist Quotes
Learn Hebrew
Israel Boycott?
Boycott Israel?
Palestinian Campaign for the Academic and Cultural Boycott of Israel
Jew Hate
International Zionism
Commentary in Russian
Middle East
The Grand Mufti Hajj Amin Al Husseini
Albert Einstein
Palestine: Ethnic Cleansing
History Arab-Israeli Conflict
Boycott Israel?
Amnesty International Report on Gaza War

Subscribe to
email newsletter for this site and others

Powered by groups.yahoo.com

Previously (see Nadia Abu El Haj versus written history and the scientific method - I), I discussed the absurdity of the explicit or implicit claim of Nadia Abu El Haj and others that Israeli archaeology had the purpose of demonstrating Jewish rights to the land, as if those rights had not been amply established and accepted before the establishment of the state of Israel. El-Haj's approach tends to discard a huge body of evidence in favor of tenuous "alternative narratives." It produces the sort of theories beloved of conspiracy theorists. It could only be considered seriously in the intellectual framework of post-structuralist approaches, that have more or less abandoned the scientific approach, which they deride as "positivist facticity."

The following reasoning, from Elia Zureik's favorable review of El Haj's work, illustrates both the method and the degree to which surrealistic logic such as that of El Haj has gained prominence and acceptance in some academic circles:

Abu El-Haj questions the inference that the Roman Legion burnt the city in 70 C.E. "How does one determine that a specific historical event is causally linked to physical remnants of fire?" The story of the Roman destruction is "much more in keeping with nationalist historiography" (p. 145). Other "equally plausible accounts," for which there is ample evidence could be that the fire "was evidence of class or sectarian conflict within Jewish society" which erupted prior to the Roman entry.

The "equally plausible" accounts are not equally plausible. The inference that the charred remains are due to the Roman fire is due to the description of that fire in contemporary Roman documents and inscriptions. These have nothing to do with any Zionist historiography. On the contrary, the alternative arguments are mostly figments of El-Haj's imagination, invented ad-hoc to fit a narrative suitable to Arab nationalist historiogrpahy. By the accepted criterion of Occam's razor, Roman destruction of Jerusalem is the simplest explanation, and therefore the one that scientists would adopt. There is no need to multiply "entities" such as "class struggles" to explain the fire. The fire could have been caused by Mrs. O'Leary's cow, like the Chicago fire, or the landing of a space craft. Anything is possible, but not all explanations are "equally plausible." It is conceivable that the charred remains were due to a different event, but the finding of such remains, dated to a specific time, in conjunction with independent evidence from written sources, tends to support the theory that the remains were due to the Roman fire, and it is the simplest explanation.

This sort of inference is no better or worse than archaeological inferences made by Woolley in Iraq or by archaeologists studying any other ancient civilization. Their errors and "leaps of faith," like those of Israeli archaeologists, are often corrected by subsequent scientific developments. Schliemann very much wanted to believe he had discovered the Troy of Homer, and Woolley very much wanted to believe perhaps, that he had discovered evidence of the biblical flood. Their errors were not due to any settler colonialist agenda, but to the natural inclination of scientists to use one set of known facts as evidence in support of another, and the inclination of archaeologists to rely on written records, because experience has shown that these records are very often correct. The errors are not fatal to scientific progress, because as long as science sticks to the empirical method, errors will eventually be corrected. Their theories were scientific theories in that they were falsifiable: they could be proven probably incorrect by a different set of findings that didn't fit the theory or by a more elegant theory that explained the facts in a better way. The "theories" of Nadia Abu El Haj and others of her school are not falsifiable. There can always be an alternative explanation for any event. They are accepted because their adherents like them, not because they are objectively the best explanations of the data.

The reasons why a scientist believes in a theory or tries to amass evidence in its favor are totally irrelevant as long as the theory provides a good framework for further research and as long as its findings can be verified or falsified by further accumulation of data and experimentation. Early astronomers gathered astronomical data to support their theologies, and the heliocentric theory was advanced to support irrelevant notions about the "music of the spheres." Newtonian physics was "incorrect," but it was useful in furthering understanding of the physical universe.

El Haj and her followers belong to a different school of thought. The bizarre proposals of El Haj, and their eager reception by Elia Zureik and others, can be explained by two circumstances. The first is an obvious pro-Palestinian bias. The second is an utter contempt for what used to be called the scientific method, and a thorough reliance on post-structuralist theory. Zureik tells us:

Abu El-Haj draws upon the sociology of science, in particular actor-network theory...

Actor-network theory is typical of post-structuralist thinking. As we learn here, actor network theory

is a constructivist approach in that it avoids essentialist explanations of events or innovations (e.g. explaining a successful theory by saying it is 'true' and the others are 'false').

Being translated from jargon, that means that the acceptability of the theory, like other post-structuralist theories, does not depend on empirical validation. Thus, the post-structuralist approach has moved us back before the scientific era, when statements that were supposedly about the real world did not have to have any real world referents, and all opinions were equally acceptable regardless of their relation to actual facts. It is therefore not surprising that Zureik and El-Haj deride "Zionist" archaeology in these terms:

For the Zionists, it was archaeological "facticity" in the positivist tradition that counted in the struggle (with the British) over the naming of places...

According to the post-structuralist approach, what matters in history are "discourse" and "narratives" rather than facts. The horrible monstrous and sneaky Zionists had the effrontery to rely on facts and empirical method rather than post-structuralist "discourse." Clearly, if a place was called Yavneh in the ancient Zionist texts, and a place called "Yibne" by the Arab locals was located exactly in the spot described for ancient Yavneh, it might be because Muhamad named it so when he came to Palestine on his flying horse, and not because of any empirical positivistic bourgeois settler colonialist explanation.

At least, the flying horse "narrative" must be given equal weight with the empirical one. That is because there are no hierarchies in narratives according to post-structuralist doctrine, a point claimed by El-Haj, and since post-structuralists apparently exclude Occam's Razor: for them, the simplest explanation is no better than any others. Since empirical data don't matter, there is no need to investigate the question of whether or not horses can fly, or to dig up Palestine or Arabia to find the remains of the horse. What matters is only that sufficient numbers of people believe the claim.

Likewise, the similarity of the name "Beisan" to "Beth Shean" and "Birsaba" to "Beersheba" could be explained away as coincidences rather than relying on "positivist facticity." Or, they could be explained as implementing the wish of pious Muslims to name their cities after biblical cities, without reference to the location of the original city, just as there is a Bethel New York, for example. By the same logic, perhaps the pyramids were created by Goualds from outer space, or perhaps ancient Egypt was really located in modern India, and the modern country of that name is just a namesake. According to El-Haj's approach, that explanation would be as good as any other.

More important and ominous than El Haj's claims themselves, is the fact that they have won academic acceptance. The approach to scientific explanation in the social science that El-Haj and others represent is apparently now normative, at least in anthropology departments. El Haj was rewarded with a coveted prize, the Hourani prize, given the post of Director of Graduate Studies, and granted tenure.

It is regrettably true, and post-structuralists will probably agree, that in any period and location, what constitutes good science is all too often whatever the people in charge consider to be good science. This is especially true when methods of empirical proof are unavailable, imperfect or ignored, and in fields where no decisive proof is often possible. Functionalist sociology, phrenology, phlogiston theory, inheritance of acquired characteristics, creationism and racial inferiority of Africans and Jews have all, at one time or another, been considered valid scientific practice in different parts of the world, either because people don't know any better, or because a particular theory is convenient for a given political or religious dogma. The Marxist roots of post-structuralism, after all, hearken back to the validation by Joseph Stalin of the quack theories of Trofim D. Lysenko regarding inheritance of acquired characteristics. They constituted a good socialist "narrative" as opposed to the alternative theories of inheritance proposed by bourgeois science, and therefore they were declared to be "true."

Apparently the Barnard Anthropology Department, and others, are enamored of the new academic religion of post-structuralist discourse, because it permits them to support their pet political theories without reference to inconvenient facts presented by "positivist facticity."

Accordingly, it was indeed out of place to petition Barnard to deny tenure to Professor El Haj, since her work is an egregious example of their discipline. But it is certainly in place to protest that the entire discipline as practiced by El Haj and her colleagues may be quack science on a par with phrenology and functionalist sociology.

Ami Isseroff

Original content is Copyright by the author 2007. Posted at ZioNation-Zionism and Israel Web Log, http://www.zionism-israel.com/log/archives/00000444.html where your intelligent and constructive comments are welcome. Disributed by ZNN list. Subscribe by sending a message to ZNN-subscribe@yahoogroups.com. Please forward by e-mail with this notice, cite this article and link to it. Other uses by permission only.

Click to Reddit! Facebook Share

add to del.icio.us

Add to digg - digg it

Replies: 3 Comments

Indeed, Daniel Jackson.

Ami Isseroff, Friday, November 9th

The fact that you mentioned the Gouald made my day.

Ariel, Friday, November 9th

Thanks, Ami, for presenting a readable and (pardon the expression) facts-based critique of another pseudo-scientific fallacy!

Misha SHAULI, Thursday, November 8th

Constructive comments, including corrections, are welcome. Do not use this space for spam, publishing articles, self promotion, racism, anti-Zionist propaganda or character defamation. Inappropriate comments will be deleted. See our Comment policy for details. By posting here, you agree to the Comment policy.


Please take our reader survey!

Our Sites

Zionism News Net
Zionism-Israel Pages
Brave Zionism
IsraŽl-Palestina.Info (Dutch & English)
Our Blogs
Israel News
IMO Blog - IsraŽl & Midden-Oosten (NL)
Israel Like this, as if
Zionism News Net
Israel & Palestijnen Nieuws Blog
IsraŽl in de Media

Blog Roll:
Adam Holland
Blue Truth
CIF Watch
Contentious Centrist
Dutchblog Israel (NL/EN)
Harry's Place
Ignoble Experiment
Irene Lancaster's Diary
Israeli-Palestinian Conflict
Jeff Weintraub Commentaries and controversies
Jewish Issues Watchdog Meretz USA Weblog
Meryl Yourish
Middle East Analysis
MidEastWeb Middle East Web Log
Modernity Blog
Pro Israel Bay Bloggers
Point of no return
Simply Jews
Something Something
Tempting Topical Topics
The Augean Stables
Unplugged Mike
Oy Bay! San Francisco Bay Area Jews
Vital Perspective
Israel Mon Amour
Liberty & Justice
On the Contrary
Magdeburger Chossid
Tulip - Israeli-Palestinian Trade Union Assoc.
Southern Wolf
Sharona's Week
Sanda & Israel
Fresno Zionism
Anti-Racist Blog
ZOTW's Zionism and Israel News
Zionism On The Web News
ZOTW's Blogs
Christian Attitudes
Dr Ginosar Recalls
Questions: Zionism anti-Zionism Israel & Palestine
Liberal for Israel

A Jew with a view
Realistic Dove
Christians Standing With Israel - Blog
SEO for Everyone
Vision to Reality: The Reut Blog
Calev's Blog
Candidly speaking from Jerusalem
Dvar Dea
Ray Cook
Shimshon 9

Mark Halawa

This link space is 4 your blog - contact us!

Other Web sites and pages:

PeaceWatch Middle East Commentary Christians Standing With Israel
Zionism On the Web
Guide to Middle East, Zionism
Z-Word blog
Labor Zionism
Le Grand Mufti Husseini
The Grand Mufti Hajj Amin El Husseini
ZNN - Zionism News Network Middle East
Euston Manifesto
Jewish Blogging
Peace With Realism
Israel Facts (NL)
Space Shuttle Blog
Love Poems
At Zionism On the Web
Articles on Zionism
Anti-Zionism Information Center
Academic boycott of Israel Resource Center
The anti-Israel Hackers
Antisemitism Information Center
Zionism Israel and Apartheid
Middle East, Peace and War
The Palestine state
ZOTW Expert Search
ZOTW Forum


Judaica: Jewish Gifts:

RSS V 1.0

RSS V 2.0

Help us improve - Please click here to take our reader survey

All entries copyright by the authors and or Zionism-Israel Information Center. Please forward materials by e-mail with URLS. Other uses by permission only.